Details: By Robert Jennings, InnerSelf.com

dfghjkhgjgh

Why Bill Clinton’s presidency became a template for economic fear-based policymaking
How the bond market myth is used to silence public investment and protect the wealthy
What actually happens when countries sell U.S. debt—and why it’s not the crisis you’ve been told
How Trump’s 2025 tariff stunt was derailed by a brilliant international bluff he was too ignorant to detect
Why the Federal Reserve stepping in to stabilize chaos from political recklessness threatens institutional trust
What we lose when we believe the myth—and who benefits from our fear
Why the bond market doesn’t vote—but you do

The Bond Market Doesn’t Rule Us—We Just Think It Does

by Robert Jennings, InnerSelf.com

Bill Clinton didn’t come into office looking to please bankers. He came in promising to rebuild a country still limping from the Cold War hangover. The Berlin Wall had fallen. The peace dividend was on the table. It was time, he said, to invest in Americans again—health care, education, roads, the things you see and feel when you drive through your town or walk into your local clinic.

But not long after he took the oath, Clinton was ushered into a different kind of room. Not a cabinet meeting. Not a policy session. A warning session. “Mr. President,” his advisors said, “if you push these programs, the bond market might lose confidence.” Translation? The big money on Wall Street might get nervous, dump Treasury bonds, and send interest rates through the roof. Suddenly, borrowing would be more expensive. The economy might wobble. Your presidency could collapse before it starts.

And just like that, the promises were shelved. Like a contractor walking off the job because the bank called in the loan, Clinton pivoted to deficit reduction and fiscal discipline. Wall Street applauded. The rest of the country? They waited for change that never came.

This wasn’t just a moment—it became the mold. A masterclass in political intimidation. Ever since, presidents and prime ministers have governed like tenants afraid of their landlord. The bond market became the phantom overlord, said to be watching every move. But here's the twist: it's not some shadowy creature. It's not a god. It's not even a single thing. It’s just people with portfolios, protecting their turf. And fear? That’s their most valuable investment.

The Bond Market Isn’t Your Boss

First, let’s strip away the mystery. The “bond market” isn’t some ancient oracle guarding the gates of fiscal wisdom. It’s a glorified swap meet for rich people’s IOUs. Treasury bonds—those government “promises to pay”—get traded like baseball cards between hedge funds, pension managers, and foreign central banks. They buy them because they’re safe. Not safe like a locked vault—safe like a toaster that always works. No matter what, the U.S. government can pay back what it owes because, spoiler alert, it creates the currency it owes it in.

Think of it like this: imagine your cousin owes you $10 but also owns the printing press that makes the $10 bill. Are you really worried he won’t pay you back? That’s the U.S. government. It can’t bounce a check in its own currency unless it decides to, and even then, it would be more political stunt than financial crisis.

So the next time someone whispers, “The bond market won’t like that,” what they’re really saying is that a few multimillionaires in high-rise offices might grumble about shifting their money from one low-risk bucket to another. It’s not a revolution. There’s no mob with torches and pitchforks. There’s just a guy in a $5,000 suit pressing the “sell” button with a latte in hand. That’s not an uprising. That’s portfolio management.

Foreign Selling: A Panic Without a Cause

Every few months, the headlines light up with a fresh financial ghost story: “China is dumping U.S. bonds!” “Japan is pulling back!” “Even Canada is cashing out!” Cue the dramatic music. Pundits start sweating. Markets twitch like they’ve seen a ghost. But here’s the reality—this isn’t a crisis, it’s housekeeping.

Foreign countries sell U.S. Treasuries for the same reason you might move your savings from one bank to another—they’ve got other plans for the money. Maybe they’re defending their own currencies. Maybe they’re plugging budget holes at home. Whatever the reason, when they sell, the bonds don’t vanish. Somebody else buys them. Pension funds, banks, insurance companies, even regular investors through retirement accounts. It’s a game of musical chairs where the music never really stops, and there are always more chairs.

And if, for some reason, the music slows down? That’s when the Federal Reserve steps in. It’s like the house band at the financial casino—it can always keep the beat going. The Fed has a digital printing press and the legal authority to use it. If demand weakens, it buys the bonds itself. No drama. No riots in the streets. No dollar collapse.

This isn’t speculation. It’s recent history. During the 2008 meltdown and again in 2020, the Fed scooped up trillions in government debt like it was Black Friday at the Treasury store. And what happened? Not hyperinflation. Not a bond revolt. Just steady prices and a growing stockpile of assets on the Fed’s balance sheet. If anything, the real fallout wasn’t inflation—it was a skyrocketing stock market and even wider inequality. The rich got richer. The bond market? It took a nap.

Why Fear Is the Favorite Tool in the Toolbox

So if the bond market isn’t some ticking time bomb waiting to blow up the economy, why does it keep showing up like the villain in every policy debate? Simple—because fear works. It’s the duct tape of politics. It silences bold ideas before they get traction. It gives nervous politicians a script to hide behind. And most importantly, it shields the wealthiest people in the country from even a whisper of redistribution.

Every time someone proposes taxing billionaires, building affordable housing, or launching a real climate plan, you can practically set your watch to the response. Out pop the deficit hawks like a bad magic trick. “We’d love to help,” they say, “but the bond market won’t let us.” It’s as if there’s a financial boogeyman living under the budget desk, ready to snatch us all away if we even think about doing something that benefits the public.

But watch what happens when the tables turn. When Congress greenlights trillions in tax cuts for corporations? Dead silence. When we spend more on weapons than the next ten countries combined? Not a peep from the markets. When Wall Street needs a bailout? The bond market suddenly finds its chill. Funny how that works.

It turns out the bond market only gets “nervous” when regular people are in line for the money. Universal healthcare? Bond crisis. Clean water in Flint? Bond jitters. A new bridge in your town? Better check with the traders in Manhattan. But another yacht subsidy or weapons system? Full steam ahead. The fear isn't economic—it's political theater. And it's played on a loop to make sure the wealthy stay wealthy while the rest of us are told to “tighten our belts.”

Monetizing Debt Isn’t a Sin—It’s a Function

Let’s bust one of the biggest myths in the playbook: when the Federal Reserve buys government debt, it’s not “printing money” the way people picture it. There’s no guy in the basement churning out hundred-dollar bills and firing them into the economy with a t-shirt cannon. What really happens? The Fed swaps Treasury bonds for bank reserves—basically, it’s exchanging one safe government IOU for another. No new money hits your wallet. No cash floods the streets.

Picture it like this: a bank had a savings bond. Now it has a digital balance with the Fed. That’s it. The bank can’t use it to buy groceries or give everyone a raise. It just sits there, unless the bank lends it out—or unless Congress decides to spend more into the real economy. And if they don’t? That money never leaves the vault.

This process is called “monetizing the debt,” but that name alone makes it sound scandalous. Like the Fed is committing some cardinal sin. In reality, it’s like topping off the antifreeze in your car—it keeps the system from overheating or freezing up. Central banks around the world do this all the time. It’s not radical. It’s not reckless. It’s part of the job.

So when the Fed buys government bonds to stabilize interest rates or pick up the slack after foreign selling, it’s not firing up a hyperinflation machine. It’s acting like a responsible mechanic. Anyone shouting “inflation!” every time the Fed hits the gas is either grossly misinformed—or counting on you to be.

Clinton, Obama, and the Soundproof Echo Chamber

Clinton wasn’t the only one handed the Wall Street script. Barack Obama walked into the White House in 2009 with the economy bleeding out on the operating table. Banks were collapsing, unemployment was spiking, and millions were losing their homes. It was the perfect moment for bold action. Big investment. A new New Deal.

But instead of going big, he was told to go careful. His advisors—many recycled from the Clinton years—whispered that anything too large might “spook the markets.” The bond market might get jittery. Interest rates might climb. So instead of a $3 trillion overhaul of infrastructure, clean energy, and job creation, we got a package barely big enough to plug the hole. Wall Street stabilized. The real economy limped along. And working Americans waited ten years for a recovery that never fully came.

This wasn’t economic caution—it was political superstition. A fear of breaking the rules written by the very people who broke the economy in the first place. The result? Another decade of underinvestment, stagnant wages, and rising inequality. The bond market didn’t panic. It barely yawned. It turns out the monster under the bed wasn’t even real.

This is how the cycle continues. Leaders believe they have to tiptoe. So they do. And because they never push, they never find out that the walls aren’t actually made of stone—they’re made of paper. But Wall Street doesn’t correct them. Why would they? A government too afraid to act is a dream come true for investors who prefer the status quo.

Reality Check: Who Really Runs the Economy?

Let’s get something straight: the United States can’t go broke in its own currency. It’s a currency sovereign, which means it creates the dollars everyone else scrambles to earn. That’s like owning the bakery and worrying you might run out of bread. The only real limits are how much flour you’ve got, how many bakers you’ve trained, and whether the oven’s on—not whether some guy in Tokyo is grumpy about your biscuit recipe.

The government doesn’t need to “find money” before it can fund healthcare or build a bridge. It needs to find political courage. We have the labor. We have the materials. What we don’t have—most of the time—is the will to use them for the common good. Instead, we bow to imaginary threats from a financial class that’s been wrong about nearly everything.

Remember, these are the same market experts who didn’t see the 2008 crash coming—until it swallowed millions of jobs. The same ones who didn’t stop the 2020 recession, even with all their models and suits and screens. Yet somehow, we still act like they’re the grown-ups in the room, qualified to veto social progress.

Letting bond traders shape public policy is like letting the pit crew drive the car. They’re important, sure—but they’re not the ones steering us into the future. And they definitely shouldn’t be the ones slamming the brakes every time someone suggests helping regular people instead of the investor class.

The Real Cost of Believing the Myth

When we fall for the story that “we can’t afford it,” we don’t just lose an argument—we lose the future. Every time a bold idea gets shelved because someone says the bond market might frown, something real disappears: a school that never gets built, a cancer patient who can’t afford care, a town that floods because the levees were never upgraded.

We delay green energy while the planet cooks. We ration healthcare in the richest country on Earth. We tell young people to chase opportunity while chaining them to student debt. All because someone, somewhere, decided that making rich investors uncomfortable was a greater risk than failing millions of people.

It’s not just absurd—it’s grotesque. We trade justice for stability, and get neither. We let imaginary threats take precedence over real suffering. And the longer we do it, the more permanent the damage becomes.

The bond market doesn’t cry when your water is undrinkable. It doesn’t grieve when a child can’t see a doctor. It doesn’t feel shame when another bridge collapses or another climate disaster displaces a family. But you do. I do. And that’s who policy should serve—not the investors looking for their next safe haven, but the people looking for a fair shot at a dignified life.

Trump’s Tariff Tantrum and the Bond Market Bluff

In early 2025, President Trump rolled out what he branded his “Liberation Day” tariffs—a reckless across-the-board 10% duty on all imports, with extra punishment aimed at countries that had the audacity to trade successfully with the U.S. The announcement landed like a drunken punch at a family reunion: loud, poorly timed, and aimed in every direction. Predictably, markets recoiled. But what happened next was almost too clever for the history books.

Instead of retaliating with just their own tariffs, a handful of Trump’s favorite “very strong trading partners”—Japan, Canada, and the EU—got together for a quiet chat. And out of that backroom conversation came a stroke of financial genius: don’t fight the tariffs with just more tariffs. Scare him where it hurts—in the bond market.

Led by Canadian Prime Minister and former central banker Mark Carney, the group began to signal, subtly but clearly, that they might start reducing their holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds. Not sell them. Just whisper about selling them. Just enough to set off alarm bells in the gold-plated halls of Trump’s economic advisors. The trap was set.

Now here’s where the irony turns poetic: Trump and his inner circle were too economically illiterate to realize the threat was hollow. As we’ve already covered, the U.S. doesn’t need foreign buyers to keep its finances afloat. The Federal Reserve can absorb any excess debt like a sponge. But Trump didn’t know that. And neither did most of his team.

So what did they do? They panicked. Just days after his big, blustery tariff rollout, Trump hit pause. A full 90-day suspension on the most extreme measures. The man who campaigned on never backing down had backed down—not because of facts, not because of reason, but because someone played his own fearmongering game better than he could.

It was financial aikido. The international coalition used the myth Trump had built his economic bravado on—the almighty bond market—and turned it against him. A phantom threat wielded by real economists to spook a man who never understood the system he was crashing around in.

It worked. Not because it was true, but because Trump believed it. That’s the real lesson here: when you build your worldview on myths and misunderstandings, you’re the easiest mark in the room.

When the Fed Becomes the Firefighter for Political Arson

There’s a big difference between the Federal Reserve stepping in to stabilize the bond market during a global crisis—and doing it because the White House keeps playing with matches. That’s exactly the danger we’re in when an administration as erratic and economically incoherent as Trump’s forces the Fed to become a full-time firefighter for bond market panic. And make no mistake, that’s not its job.

The Fed is supposed to manage monetary policy: interest rates, inflation targets, and broad financial stability. But under Trump’s heavy-handed tariff games, erratic diplomacy, and headline-chasing policies, the Fed is increasingly being asked to clean up messes it didn’t make. It’s like asking the fire department to water your lawn because your neighbor keeps setting trash fires.

Here’s the problem: every time the Fed steps in to buy up excess Treasuries and calm markets jittery from Trump’s trade wars or fiscal tantrums, it erodes the idea that markets are guided by actual economic fundamentals. It creates a world where investors don’t ask, “Is this a sound investment?” but rather, “Will the Fed bail this out if it goes sideways?” That’s not stability. That’s moral hazard with a side of political dysfunction.

Worse, it gives bad actors—like Trump and his economic team of loyalists—the false sense that they can do whatever they want and the Fed will just sweep up the pieces. Attack a trading partner? The Fed’s got it. Spark a bond sell-off with a late-night tweet? The Fed will step in. Default on a promise? Blame the Fed and print more talking points.

That kind of pressure isn’t just bad economics—it’s a long-term threat to the Fed’s independence. A central bank that becomes a political shield instead of a financial steward loses its credibility. And once credibility goes, so does trust. And trust, not money, is the real backbone of any financial system.

So yes, the Fed has tools. Yes, it can step in. But when it's doing that not because the economy demands it, but because leadership is driving blindfolded into a fireworks store, we’re no longer just talking about market mechanics—we’re talking about institutional survival.

The Bond Market Doesn’t Vote—But You Do

The next time someone mutters that “the bond market won’t like it,” remember this: the bond market isn’t a citizen. It doesn’t vote. It doesn’t drive your roads, send its kids to your schools, or wait six months to see a doctor. It’s not some divine authority—it’s just a financial thermometer, reacting to the weather made by the real world. And sometimes, that weather gets stormy because of incompetence, not economics.

For too long, we’ve let Wall Street ghosts shape our choices. We’ve allowed myths about “market confidence” to overrule human needs. We’ve watched presidents—from Clinton to Obama to Trump—cave to imaginary threats while the real threats—climate breakdown, inequality, crumbling infrastructure—grow louder every year. And now, even our central bank is stuck playing cleanup for policy arsonists.

But here’s the truth: the bond market is a tool. That’s all it ever was. Like a hammer, it can help build something useful—or it can be used to knock down every public good we try to raise. The choice of how it’s used shouldn’t belong to bondholders or hedge funds. It should belong to us.

If we want to build a future worth living in—a future with clean energy, universal care, real opportunity—we’ll need to stop flinching every time the market clears its throat. We don’t need permission from investors to do what’s right. We only need the courage to stop believing their fear is our fate.

The bond market doesn’t vote. But we do. Let’s start acting like it matters.

About the Author

Robert Jennings is the co-publisher of InnerSelf.com, a platform dedicated to empowering individuals and fostering a more connected, equitable world. A veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Army, Robert draws on his diverse life experiences, from working in real estate and construction to building InnerSelf with his wife, Marie T. Russell, to bring a practical, grounded perspective to life’s challenges. Founded in 1996, InnerSelf.com shares insights to help people make informed, meaningful choices for themselves and the planet. More than 30 years later, InnerSelf continues to inspire clarity and empowerment.

Creative Commons 4.0

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License. Attribute the author Robert Jennings, InnerSelf.com. Link back to the article This article originally appeared on InnerSelf.com

Recommended books:

Capital in the Twenty-First Century
by Thomas Piketty. (Translated by Arthur Goldhammer)

In Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Thomas Piketty analyzes a unique collection of data from twenty countries, ranging as far back as the eighteenth century, to uncover key economic and social patterns. But economic trends are not acts of God. Political action has curbed dangerous inequalities in the past, says Thomas Piketty, and may do so again. A work of extraordinary ambition, originality, and rigor, Capital in the Twenty-First Century reorients our understanding of economic history and confronts us with sobering lessons for today. His findings will transform debate and set the agenda for the next generation of thought about wealth and inequality.

Click here for more info and/or to order this book on Amazon.

Nature's Fortune: How Business and Society Thrive by Investing in Nature
by Mark R. Tercek and Jonathan S. Adams.

Nature's Fortune: How Business and Society Thrive by Investing in Nature by Mark R. Tercek and Jonathan S. Adams. What is nature worth? The answer to this question—which traditionally has been framed in environmental terms—is revolutionizing the way we do business. In Nature’s Fortune, Mark Tercek, CEO of The Nature Conservancy and former investment banker, and science writer Jonathan Adams argue that nature is not only the foundation of human well-being, but also the smartest commercial investment any business or government can make. The forests, floodplains, and oyster reefs often seen simply as raw materials or as obstacles to be cleared in the name of progress are, in fact as important to our future prosperity as technology or law or business innovation. Nature’s Fortune offers an essential guide to the world’s economic—and environmental—well-being.

Click here for more info and/or to order this book on Amazon.

Beyond Outrage: What has gone wrong with our economy and our democracy, and how to fix it -- by Robert B. Reich

In this timely book, Robert B. Reich argues that nothing good happens in Washington unless citizens are energized and organized to make sure Washington acts in the public good. The first step is to see the big picture. Beyond Outrage connects the dots, showing why the increasing share of income and wealth going to the top has hobbled jobs and growth for everyone else, undermining our democracy; caused Americans to become increasingly cynical about public life; and turned many Americans against one another. He also explains why the proposals of the “regressive right” are dead wrong and provides a clear roadmap of what must be done instead. Here’s a plan for action for everyone who cares about the future of America.

Click here for more info or to order this book on Amazon.

This Changes Everything: Occupy Wall Street and the 99% Movement
by Sarah van Gelder and staff of YES! Magazine.

This Changes Everything shows how the Occupy movement is shifting the way people view themselves and the world, the kind of society they believe is possible, and their own involvement in creating a society that works for the 99% rather than just the 1%. Attempts to pigeonhole this decentralized, fast-evolving movement have led to confusion and misperception. In this volume, the editors of YES! Magazine bring together voices from inside and outside the protests to convey the issues, possibilities, and personalities associated with the Occupy Wall Street movement. This book features contributions from Naomi Klein, David Korten, Rebecca Solnit, Ralph Nader, and others, as well as Occupy activists who were there from the beginning.

Click here for more info and/or to order this book on Amazon.

Article Recap

This article dismantles the decades-old myth that the bond market holds the U.S. economy hostage. From Clinton to Obama to Trump, American leaders have bowed to a phantom threat—sacrificing bold policies to appease markets that never needed appeasing. When foreign countries sell U.S. bonds, the Fed steps in. When the Fed buys debt, it’s not “printing money”—it’s managing the system. And when Trump launched reckless tariffs, international leaders used his own fear of the bond market to neutralize him without firing a shot. The real danger isn’t the market—it’s the lies we’ve been told about it. The bond market doesn’t vote. But we do. And it’s time we governed like that matters.

#BondMarketFear #FederalDebtMyth #WallStreetControl #EconomicJustice #PoliticalMyths #RobertJennings #InnerSelf #MonetaryPolicy #FinancialManipulation

Robert Jennings