In this Article:

• How is authoritarianism spreading worldwide?
• What role do bigotry and racism play in modern politics?
• Why do authoritarian leaders target marginalized groups?
• How is nationalism being weaponized by authoritarian regimes?
• Can democracy survive the growing tide of authoritarianism?
• What are the signs of authoritarianism eroding democratic institutions?

The Rising Tide of Authoritarianism

by Robert Jennings, InnerSelf.com

In the modern world, democracy is facing unprecedented challenges. While democratic ideals—freedom, equality, and justice—have spread globally over the past century, today, we witness a disturbing shift toward authoritarianism. But what is driving this rise, and why are so many people embracing leaders who seek to centralize power, restrict freedoms, and undermine democratic institutions? Could it be fear, uncertainty, or simply a loss of faith in the promises of democracy itself? Regardless of the reasons, one thing is clear: democracy is on a precipice, and the consequences of inaction could be dire.

Authoritarianism doesn't announce itself with fanfare. It creeps in under the guise of national security, economic revival, or even tradition. Leaders who employ authoritarian tactics often position themselves as the only answer to societal chaos, making themselves indispensable to a nation's survival. In this framework, the future of democracy is no longer a given—it is something we must actively protect.

The Politics of Fear and Division

One of authoritarian regimes' most potent tools is fear. Autocratic leaders can rally supporters around a shared enemy by stoking division and exploiting societal anxieties. But whom are they targeting? More often than not, it's the marginalized—the people with the least power to defend themselves.

Take a look at the way immigrants, the LGBTQ+ community, and racial minorities are often portrayed in political discourse today. They are labeled as threats, undeserving of rights, or "others" who don't belong. This isn't new. It's a well-worn tactic used by regimes throughout history to consolidate power. But why does it work so well? Perhaps it's because fear is one of the most primal human emotions. When people feel threatened—economic insecurity, cultural change, or political instability—they often seek a strong leader who promises protection, even if it comes with someone else's freedom.

But who decides which groups are worthy of inclusion and which are not? Authoritarian leaders do. Drawing lines between "us" and "them" creates an environment where division flourishes, turning neighbor against neighbor. We must ask ourselves: Do we want to live in a world where fear defines our relationships with others?

Bigotry and Racism: Fueling the Authoritarian Fire

At the core of many authoritarian movements lies the exploitation of bigotry and racism. Leaders who seek absolute power often rely on these deep-seated prejudices to divide societies and rally support. By targeting marginalized racial or ethnic groups, authoritarian figures can present themselves as protectors of a national identity that must be defended against so-called "outsiders" or "inferior" peoples. But is this protection truly in the nation's interest, or does it serve only to deepen societal wounds?

Racism, in particular, is a powerful tool for authoritarian leaders because it taps into long-standing fears and historical divisions. By framing certain races or ethnicities as threats to the nation’s economic security or cultural purity, these leaders encourage the populace to embrace xenophobia. We’ve seen this play out with alarming frequency—whether it’s immigrants being blamed for crime and job losses or racial minorities being portrayed as inherently inferior or dangerous. What happens when society accepts these narratives? The result is a toxic environment where hatred flourishes, and people are dehumanized simply because of the color of their skin.

Racism isn’t just a relic of the past. In today's political climate, we continue to see racial scapegoating used as a tactic to distract from real issues and consolidate power. The question we must ask ourselves is this: Are we willing to let the oldest form of division—racial hatred—lead us into a future defined by authoritarianism? If history has taught us anything, it’s that bigotry and racism serve only to weaken the moral and social fabric of nations. And in a world where democracy is already under attack, we cannot afford to ignore the insidious ways that these prejudices are being weaponized.

The Weaponization of Nationalism

Nationalism has long been a double-edged sword. On one hand, it can foster pride and a sense of belonging. On the other hand, it can be twisted into a weapon, used to exclude and demonize anyone deemed "unpatriotic" or insufficiently aligned with the ruling party's vision of national identity. Today, we are seeing this darker side of nationalism play out on the global stage, and it's causing actual harm.

Nationalism, when weaponized, becomes a dangerous ideology that pits nations and people against each other. It fosters a mentality that one's country is superior to others and that any threat to the national identity—real or imagined—must be met with aggression. What does this mean for immigrants, refugees, or people of different racial or religious backgrounds? Too often, they become the scapegoats, blamed for the country's woes, no matter how complex those problems are.

We must ask ourselves: Is nationalism a path toward unity or a vehicle for exclusion? And more importantly, who benefits when nationalism is weaponized? Authoritarian leaders do. By appealing to the populace's pride and fears, they create a narrative in which they can protect the nation's identity from external and internal threats. But this protection comes at a high cost: the erosion of empathy, the normalization of xenophobia, and the slow march towards isolationism.

Eroding Trust in Institutions

Another critical element in the rise of authoritarianism is the systematic erosion of trust in democratic institutions. It starts slowly—doubts about the media's integrity, the judiciary's fairness, and the legitimacy of elections are sown. Over time, these doubts become certainties in the minds of many, leaving the public disillusioned and distrustful of the very institutions meant to safeguard democracy.

But who benefits when we stop trusting our institutions? The very leaders often want to undermine democracy in the first place. By discrediting the media, they ensure that only their version of the truth is heard. By attacking the judiciary, they weaken the rule of law and increase their ability to rule unchecked. And by questioning the integrity of elections, they make it easier to claim victory, regardless of the actual results.

Can a democracy survive when its people no longer trust the systems that uphold it? We must consider this question carefully because it is tough to restore trust once it is broken. The stakes are too high to ignore the warning signs—our democratic institutions are only as strong as our belief in them.

The Danger of Rewriting History

History is often one of the first casualties of authoritarian regimes. Why? Because if you can control the past, you can control the present. Leaders who seek absolute power often rewrite or distort history to justify their actions, framing themselves as the rightful saviors of the nation while erasing or vilifying their opponents.

This rewriting of history can take many forms. In some cases, it involves downplaying or outright denying atrocities committed in the past. In others, it means glorifying moments of national pride while conveniently forgetting the darker chapters. But what happens when a country loses connection to a truthful account of its history? It needs to improve its ability to learn from past mistakes.

We must ask ourselves: What kind of society we want to build? One that learns from its past or is doomed to repeat it? When history is rewritten, we lose the lessons that could prevent future injustices. And when we no longer have a shared understanding of where we've come from, we risk being led astray by leaders who manipulate the past to fit their agenda.

The Future of Democracy at a Crossroads

Today, the world faces a critical juncture. Will we uphold democratic values or succumb to the lure of authoritarianism? Our decisions in the coming years will shape our future and generations to come. But what are the stakes, and what can we do to ensure democracy survives?

The fight for democracy isn't just happening in Washington, D.C., or the capitals of other nations—it's happening in every community, every neighborhood, and every voting booth. Each of us has a role to play, whether through civic engagement, standing up for the rights of marginalized groups, or simply staying informed about the political issues that shape our world. Democracy doesn't die in a single moment—it erodes gradually when people stop paying attention.

Is the path forward clear? Hardly. Democracy is messy and often imperfect, but it remains the best system for ensuring that power rests in the hands of the people, not in the hands of a few. On the other hand, authoritarianism promises quick solutions at the expense of freedom and justice. Which future will we choose?

Article Recap:

This article explores the rise of authoritarianism and its close connection to bigotry and racism. By exploiting societal fears, authoritarian leaders foster division, scapegoat marginalized groups, and weaken democratic institutions. The focus is on how authoritarianism manipulates nationalism and fear to control power, erode trust, and increase political violence, posing a serious threat to the future of democracy.

About the Author

Robert Jennings is co-publisher of InnerSelf.com with his wife Marie T Russell. He attended the University of Florida, Southern Technical Institute, and the University of Central Florida with studies in real estate, urban development, finance, architectural engineering, and elementary education. He was a member of the US Marine Corps and The US Army having commanded a field artillery battery in Germany. He worked in real estate finance, construction and development for 25 years before starting InnerSelf.com in 1996.

InnerSelf is dedicated to sharing information that allows people to make educated and insightful choices in their personal life, for the good of the commons, and for the well-being of the planet. InnerSelf Magazine is in its 30+year of publication in either print (1984-1995) or online as InnerSelf.com. Please support our work.

 Creative Commons 4.0

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License. Attribute the author Robert Jennings, InnerSelf.com. Link back to the article This article originally appeared on InnerSelf.com